Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4_107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Inversion Problems in Nondestructive Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The liftoff is defined as a uniform random variable with the range of 0.55 +/-0.05 mm as shown in Figure 2(b). VIC-3D® was used to generate the simulated results for the study [3]. The gap between the plates was initially fixed at 0.3 mm and the frequency for the study was set to 4.0 kHz.…”
Section: Case Study Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The liftoff is defined as a uniform random variable with the range of 0.55 +/-0.05 mm as shown in Figure 2(b). VIC-3D® was used to generate the simulated results for the study [3]. The gap between the plates was initially fixed at 0.3 mm and the frequency for the study was set to 4.0 kHz.…”
Section: Case Study Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational methods have been proposed to develop and evaluate NDE inspection systems to address these problems for a few decades. Significant progress has been made in forward modeling, detection theory, and inverse theory [2][3][4]. Although eddy current models can accurately simulate many realistic NDE scenarios, limited progress has been made to implement model-based inverse methods partly due to the wide range of varying conditions under test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical prediction of eddy-current probe output signals for various non-destructive testing applications usually involves the solution of the electromagnetic field problem due to a currentcarrying loop in the vicinity of a flawless conductor. A general solution for this problem can be sought in the use of various numerical techniques, including the finite element method [4], the boundary element method [5] and the volume integral method [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant research into inverse methods for flaw characterization using eddy current data has been explored [1][2][3][4][5][6]. To date, most efforts have primarily addressed the sizing of surface breaking cracks [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], with limited work on the problem of sizing corrosion pits [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%