2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11117-010-0086-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some inequalities involving determinants, eigenvalues, and Schur complements in Euclidean Jordan algebras

Abstract: In this paper, using Schur complements, we prove various inequalities in Euclidean Jordan algebras. Specifically, we study analogues of the inequalities of Fischer, Hadamard, Bergstrom, Oppenheim, and other inequalities related to determinants, eigenvalues, and Schur complements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where E ij is the n × n matrix with 1s in the (i, j) and (j, i) slots and zeros elsewhere. It has been proved in [8], Theorem 8, that x∆y is a (symmetric) positive semidefinite matrix when x, y ≥ 0.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E ij is the n × n matrix with 1s in the (i, j) and (j, i) slots and zeros elsewhere. It has been proved in [8], Theorem 8, that x∆y is a (symmetric) positive semidefinite matrix when x, y ≥ 0.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Theorem 3.1, for any a, b ∈ V , there exist Λ, Λ ∈ Aut(V ) such that |a + b| ≤ Λ(|a|) + Λ (|b|). This implies that λ ↓ i (|a + b|) ≤ λ ↓ i (Λ(|a|) + Λ (|b|)) for all i (see [6]). Since f is increasing function, we have f (λ ↓ i (|a + b|)) ≤ f (λ ↓ i (Λ(|a|) + Λ (|b|))) for all i.…”
Section: Respectively If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This has been observed in [10] with a different proof and was crucially used in proving the Hölder type inequality [11] ||x • y|| 1 ≤ ||x|| p ||y|| q , where 1 ≤ p, q ≤ ∞ with 1 p + 1 q = 1. When x ≥ 0, a consequence of u + w ≺ x is the inequality det(x) ≤ det(u + v) = det(u) det(v) , which is known as the generalized Fischer inequality (see [13], Prop. 2).…”
Section: To See This Letmentioning
confidence: 99%