1957
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.113.12.1103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Implications of Conditional Reflex Studies for Placebo Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

1958
1958
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…45,46 Pavlov noticed that dogs were salivating to a neutral stimulus such as ringing a bell (conditioned stimulus), which was previously associated with food (unconditioned stimulus). 47 Several studies have shown that conditioning can occur in humans, too.…”
Section: Conditioning Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 Pavlov noticed that dogs were salivating to a neutral stimulus such as ringing a bell (conditioned stimulus), which was previously associated with food (unconditioned stimulus). 47 Several studies have shown that conditioning can occur in humans, too.…”
Section: Conditioning Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one factor that seems to apply to placebo responses across species is that of conditioning, including Pavlovian conditioning. Indeed, Gliedman and colleagues [27] forwarded this account as early as 1957. Subsequently, Herrnstein provided early pre-clinical evidence supporting this hypothesis, showing that a conditioned stimulus (i.e., placebo) paired with the amnesic agent scopolamine causes animals to perform poorly in a memory test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CR can then also be looked upon as a placebo -in this case produced via fi rst order conditioning. I believe this is what is behind the conditioning explanation of the placebo response of such researchers as Gliedman, Gantt and Teitelbaum, 1957;Hernstein, 1962;Knowles, 1963;and Wickramasekera, 1980. I believe the above two-fold (fi rst-order and higher-order conditioning) explanation may help throw some light on the questions raised in the section on placebos in Kirsch's 1985 paper on response expectancies. This should help eliminate the apparent clash between the 'conditioning' and the 'response expectancy' explanation of placebos if we can look upon the terms 'response expectancy'and 'belief'as being similar as I have previously discussed, and see that conditioning is also a factor in the 'expectancy' placebo, although higher-order as opposed to fi rst-order.…”
Section: Explaining the Placebo Effectmentioning
confidence: 96%