1990
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90080-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some implications for the study of the doctor-patient interaction: Power, structure, and agency in the works of Howard Waitzkin and Arthur Kleinman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the most seemingly 'powerless' people are able to mobilize some types of resources to establish control over aspects of their daily lives (Pappas, 1990). CAM offered a way for our participants to claim control over lives disrupted by chronic illness and its trajectory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the most seemingly 'powerless' people are able to mobilize some types of resources to establish control over aspects of their daily lives (Pappas, 1990). CAM offered a way for our participants to claim control over lives disrupted by chronic illness and its trajectory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches are used: those which examine the relationship at an individualistic level and those which place the relationship within the wider power relationships of society (Pappas, 1990). Conflict issues between the health professional and the user are interpreted on the one hand as arising from a clash of explanatory models or different frames of reference and on the other as resulting from political and economic differences.…”
Section: Quality Of Health Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation of structure and process in the study of health care practices has been criticized, as this limits the scope of analyses ( Pappas 1990). For instance, it has been suggested that professional cooperation in health care is hampered by class ( Davies 1979) and tradition ( Keddy et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%