1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02698898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some groups whose reduced C*-algebra is simple

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplicity of C * red (F n ) was proved in [16], and Powers' method has been extended to various free products [1], [13], or C * -algebras of discrete groups [5], [9], [10]. The proofs use technical estimates inside B(l 2 (A, τ )), which "move towards 0" any element having trace 0, by using sums of inner automorphisms, i.e.…”
Section: Powers' Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplicity of C * red (F n ) was proved in [16], and Powers' method has been extended to various free products [1], [13], or C * -algebras of discrete groups [5], [9], [10]. The proofs use technical estimates inside B(l 2 (A, τ )), which "move towards 0" any element having trace 0, by using sums of inner automorphisms, i.e.…”
Section: Powers' Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case one can be more precise: the action (GÂP, 1 ) is n(W)-filling. The proof follows from the remarks in [BCH,p. 127].…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…He proved that C; (1F) is simple (that is, has no non trivial two-sided ideals). We give below a quick proof of Powers'result, inspired by [BeCoHa94].…”
Section: Simplicity Of Reduced C*-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 94%