2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(01)00087-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some garnet microstructures: an illustration of the potential of orientation maps and misorientation analysis in microstructural studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All samples have maxima at [001], and the high-strain samples also have maxima at [010]. In terms of tilt and twist walls, tilt walls will have a misorientation axis perpendicular to both the Burgers vector and the normal to the slip plane of the dominant dislocations, while twist walls will have a misorientation axis perpendicular to the Burgers vectors and parallel to the normal to the slip plane [e.g., Kruse et al, 2001;Prior et al, 2002] [20] Crystallographic preferred orientations (CPOs) agree with this interpretation. In the pole figures of orientation data in Figure 4, all samples exhibit a common, although weak, fabric with girdles of [100] and [001] axes perpendicular to the compression direction and [010] maxima parallel to the compression direction.…”
Section: Microstructural Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples have maxima at [001], and the high-strain samples also have maxima at [010]. In terms of tilt and twist walls, tilt walls will have a misorientation axis perpendicular to both the Burgers vector and the normal to the slip plane of the dominant dislocations, while twist walls will have a misorientation axis perpendicular to the Burgers vectors and parallel to the normal to the slip plane [e.g., Kruse et al, 2001;Prior et al, 2002] [20] Crystallographic preferred orientations (CPOs) agree with this interpretation. In the pole figures of orientation data in Figure 4, all samples exhibit a common, although weak, fabric with girdles of [100] and [001] axes perpendicular to the compression direction and [010] maxima parallel to the compression direction.…”
Section: Microstructural Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing and presentation of EBSD data Non-indexed solutions were replaced by the most common neighbour orientation to reduce data noise, following the procedure tested by Prior et al (2002) and Bestmann and Prior (2003). The resulting data are presented in form of pole figures (upper hemisphere, equal angle stereographic projection) and of colour-coded maps.…”
Section: Electron Backscatter Diffraction (Ebsd) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior et al 2002;Barrie et al 2008;Piazolo et al 2008) is a method for determining the geometry of low-angle boundary and the active slip system(s) from EBSD data. When the 3D orientation of a boundary is unknown, the boundary trace analysis provides a crystallographically consistent solution for the boundary geometry, if ideal tilt and twist boundary models are assumed.…”
Section: Boundary Trace Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some domains of the grain yielded poor quality EBSPs and were unable to be indexed. The average Slip systems were resolved from EBSD data using a simple geometric approach that relates the geometry of low-angle tilt and twist boundaries and the dislocations responsible for their formation 21, [25][26][27] . The map trace of the boundary and the crystallographic dispersion axis were used to reconstruct the 3D boundary orientation, and in turn relate the boundary and dispersion axis orientation to dislocation slip plane and slip direction by assuming end-member tilt boundary models.…”
Section: Electron Backscatter Diffraction (Ebsd)mentioning
confidence: 99%