1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-6636(95)00010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some fundamental issues of damage mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) It avoids the "mixed" terms K and K (or M and M in dynamics), (19), facilitating the implementation.…”
Section: Phantom Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(i) It avoids the "mixed" terms K and K (or M and M in dynamics), (19), facilitating the implementation.…”
Section: Phantom Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This softening can be explained by damage mechanics due to the initiation, growth, and coalescences of microcracks that reduce the effective cross-sectional area, Figure 2. For more details, the reader is referred to numerous articles and books on damage mechanics [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The use of strain-softening material models leads to an ill-posed boundary value problem (BVP) [27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of a simple scalar representation of damage has been criticized since it fails to indicate the directional nature of the damage associated with microcracks in the more brittle materials, e.g. Krajcinovic and Mastilovic (1995). Second and fourth order tensors are therefore recommended for that purpose particularly for the determination of the anisotropic effective moduli influenced by damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This damage mechanism is then experimentally quantified by micrographic analysis and correlated to a macroscopic damage parameter D macro , (Figure 4-b) through the developed micromechanical model. The D macro is defined using the well-known damage mechanics theory [16,17] and expressed such as (Eq. 5):…”
Section: Experimental Approach and Tests Datamentioning
confidence: 99%