2016
DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2007.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some factors influencing quality of spontaneous or induced sputum for inflammatory cell analysis

Abstract: Patients with increased airway secretions in the days preceding the test, easy expectoration and "good" macroscopic aspect of the sputum are more likely to produce sputum sample adequate for inflammatory cell analysis. If the first sputum sample is adequate, subsequent samples are very likely to be adequate as well. If the first sputum sample is inadequate, the quality of subsequent samples cannot be predicted, since there are similar probabilities of having adequate or inadequate samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The induced sputum method is noninvasive and not limited to disease, but the operating procedures are quite stringent and complicated, since the results could be susceptible to interference. [ 22 ] In the recent years, FeNO, as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation, has been attracted wide attention. FeNO is more convenient, rapid, reproducible, and less painful than induced sputum analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induced sputum method is noninvasive and not limited to disease, but the operating procedures are quite stringent and complicated, since the results could be susceptible to interference. [ 22 ] In the recent years, FeNO, as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation, has been attracted wide attention. FeNO is more convenient, rapid, reproducible, and less painful than induced sputum analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%