Some factors in the perception of relative motion: A preliminary experiment.

Carr, Harvey A.; Hardy, Marjorie

doi:10.1037/h0068843

Cited by 7 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Induced movement can arise from linear motion with and without overall displacement of the inducing stimulus (Carr & Hardy, 1920;Duncker, 1929Duncker, /1938Over & Lovegrove, 1973), rotational motion (Duncker, 1929(Duncker, /1938, and motion in depth.…”

Section: Types Of Displaymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since early empirical investigation of induced movement by Carr and Hardy (1920), Thelin (1927), and Duncker (1929and Duncker ( /1938, there has been a steady trickle of reports showing that induced movement can occur in a wide variety of displays.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Current knowledge about induced movement may have important implications for visual perception of object morion. Among possibly important factors is size of display, which can vary from two small spots (e.g., Carr & Hardy, 1920) to displays occupying most of the observer's visual field (e.g., Post, 1986).A second major purpose of this overview is to examine explanations for induced movement (Explanations section). Duncker's (1929Duncker's ( /1938 findings have had an important influence here, although many of his suggestions have subsequently been shown to require at least some modification.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among possibly important factors is size of display, which can vary from two small spots (e.g., Carr & Hardy, 1920) to displays occupying most of the observer's visual field (e.g., Post, 1986).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview.

Reinhardt-Rutland¹

1988

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Induced movement, illusory movement in a stationary stimulus resulting from adjoining movement, has received steady experimental investigation over the last 70 years or so. It is observed under different viewing conditions in a wide variety of displays that differ considerably in overall size and in form of inducing and induced stimuli. Explanations have been diverse, some being based on relations within the display and others invoking mediation by other aspects of the observer's perception. Probably, no one explanation can account for all forms of induced movement. Current knowledge about induced movement may have important implications for visual perception of object morion. Among possibly important factors is size of display, which can vary from two small spots (e.g., Carr & Hardy, 1920) to displays occupying most of the observer's visual field (e.g., Post, 1986).A second major purpose of this overview is to examine explanations for induced movement (Explanations section). Duncker's (1929Duncker's ( /1938 findings have had an important influence here, although many of his suggestions have subsequently been shown to require at least some modification. For example, his theory I thank J. Morss for reading an earlier version of this article, J. Ravey for translation, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions.

show abstract

Section: Types Of Displaymentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations