2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6211-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Extensions and Applications of the Eisenstein Irreducibility Criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case we have s(m − m 1 ) − a(d − d 1 ) = 1, which in view of (1) shows that sm 1 = ad 1 , and since a and s are coprime, we see now that d 1 must be divisible by s.…”
Section: With These Notations Condition (B) Readsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case we have s(m − m 1 ) − a(d − d 1 ) = 1, which in view of (1) shows that sm 1 = ad 1 , and since a and s are coprime, we see now that d 1 must be divisible by s.…”
Section: With These Notations Condition (B) Readsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are many recent results that provide irreducibility conditions for various classes of polynomials by using techniques coming from valuation theory (see for instance [23], [24], [2], [3], [4], [8], [5] and [9]), or Newton polygon method (see for instance [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [1], [6], [7], [22] and [25]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%