2009
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v14-682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some examples of dynamics for Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns

Abstract: We give three examples of stochastic processes in the Gelfand-Tsetlin cone in which each component evolves independently apart from a blocking and pushing interaction. These processes give rise to couplings between certain conditioned Markov processes, last passage times and exclusion processes. In the first two examples, we deduce known identities in distribution between such processes whilst in the third example, the components of the process cannot escape past a wall at the origin and we obtain a new relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar Markov chains have been previously studied in [8] without the wall, and in [50] with a different ("symplectic") interaction with the wall. [39] as a part of a solution of a much more general problem).…”
Section: Random Surface Growthmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar Markov chains have been previously studied in [8] without the wall, and in [50] with a different ("symplectic") interaction with the wall. [39] as a part of a solution of a much more general problem).…”
Section: Random Surface Growthmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Similar Markov chains have been previously studied in [8] without the wall, and in [49] The measures M t are the Fourier transforms of the distinguished one-parameter family of indecomposable characters of O(∞) (the indecomposable characters of O(∞) were classified in [38] as a part of a solution of a much more general problem). It is natural to call them the Plancherel measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If we connect Y (N − 1; T ) to a field of random Young diagrams, then the desired statement would follow from the determinantal structure of the Schur process described in Section 3.2. The desired connection of the mixed TASEP with particle-dependent inhomogeneity to Schur processes is in well-known and follows from the column Robinson-Schensted-Knuth (RSK) correspondences (see [Ful97], [Sta01] for details on RSK, and, e.g., [Joh00], [O'C03a], [WW09] for probabilistic applications of RSK to TASEPs) or, alternatively, from the results of [BF14]. The precise connection reads as follows.…”
Section: Determinantal Structure Of Dgcgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A unified approach to both the RSK type and the BF type fields in the half-continuous setting (details on half-continuous degenerations of random fields may be found in Appendices A.6 and A.9) was suggested in [BP16b]. In fully discrete setting, elements of BF type fields for Schur polynomials appeared in [WW09], [BF14].…”
Section: Schur Whittakermentioning
confidence: 99%