1967
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(67)90005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some electrical properties of lipid bilayer membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are expressed in this manner for convenience. Moreover, it should be noted that biological membranes generally cannot support potentials in excess of 150 to 200 mV, see [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are expressed in this manner for convenience. Moreover, it should be noted that biological membranes generally cannot support potentials in excess of 150 to 200 mV, see [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell in which membranes were formed was similar to that described by Miyamoto and Thompson (1967). The membrane support was 1/32 inch plexiglas with a 1.3 mm diameter orifice.…”
Section: Ce//smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane resistances were determined with a circuit similar to that described by Miyamoto and Thompson (1967). Unless otherwise noted, the potential across the membrane was held at 20 mV.…”
Section: Electrical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was not surprising since artificial bilayer membranes made from phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylglycerol (17), or a chloroformmethanol solution of egg phosphatidylcholine and tetradecane (15) exhibit considerable selectivity to alkali cations. In the latter system, relative permeabilities to the alkali cations, expressed as cation transference numbers, were K+ > Cs+ > Na+ > Rb+ > Li' (15). And, the self-diffusion rates of Na+, K+, and Rb+ m, asured separately through phosphatidylserine vesicles (17) foflowed the series K+ > Rb+ > Na+ (1.0:0.82:0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%