1954
DOI: 10.1037/h0054614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some effects of unequal distribution of information in a wheel group structure.

Abstract: IN THE immediately preceding report, Shaw (1) investigated some effects of unequal distribution of problem-related information in group structures. In general, he found that information distribution within structures had no effect upon over-all structure measures of time, message units, errors, or morale although decreasing or increasing the amount of information initially available to an indiindual within a structure had an effect similar to respectively decreasing or increasing the individual centrality inde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1959
1959
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The information overload problem in organisations was dealt with from the behavioural science viewpoint by, inter alia, Simon (1957Simon ( , 1974, Newell and Simon (1972), Miller (1956, 1957, Miller (1969), Slovic et al, (1977) and Payne (1980). At the forefront of the research, Gilchrist et al (1954) point out the existence of an information threshold, which when exceeded leads to obvious efficiency losses in those communication nets investigated by them. (Similar results were obtained by Streufert and Driver, (1965) and Schroder et al, (1967) with their inverted U-hypothesis, and saturation hypothesis).…”
Section: Information Overloadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information overload problem in organisations was dealt with from the behavioural science viewpoint by, inter alia, Simon (1957Simon ( , 1974, Newell and Simon (1972), Miller (1956, 1957, Miller (1969), Slovic et al, (1977) and Payne (1980). At the forefront of the research, Gilchrist et al (1954) point out the existence of an information threshold, which when exceeded leads to obvious efficiency losses in those communication nets investigated by them. (Similar results were obtained by Streufert and Driver, (1965) and Schroder et al, (1967) with their inverted U-hypothesis, and saturation hypothesis).…”
Section: Information Overloadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example will clarify this: 16 In the experiment to be reported, no instructions -were given to S's as to the different existing possibilities of communication-content, 2nd the message-sheets were not preceded. The implication is that circle-groups have a disadvantage in developing a higir degree of decision-centredness; it is impossible for one position in a four-positioncircle to make decisions for the total group.…”
Section: Group-structure and Group-performance 369mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower independence limits possibilities for action/performance and influences the persons' willingness to perform at their optimum level, leaving them uninterested in further participation [14]. Saturation refers to the total number of information transfer requirements placed upon a user in a given position in the network [51]. The effectiveness of a group acts inversely with saturation: with greater saturation, the group is less efficient.…”
Section: Broader Individual Behavior Considerations and Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%