1971
DOI: 10.2527/jas1971.3351129x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Effects of Obesity in Beef Females1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, most of the correlations between embryo production and subcutaneous fat deposition were low, indicating random sources of variation, but animals with more back fat tended to produce fewer transferable embryos. This finding ties in with the reports that 15 experimental obese cows with an average fat thickness of 3-4 cm at the back required more services per conception than cows with an average backfat thickness of 1-73 cm (Arnett, Holland and Totusek, 1971), and that 10% lower conception rates at first service were obtained in obese heifers following spontaneous ovulation (Wiltbank, Bond, Warnick, Davis, Cook, Reynolds and Hazen, 1965). The extreme fat accumulation observed in a few animals suggested that accumulation in the regions of the ovarian bursae and oviducts can interfere with or prevent normal ovum transport into or through the oviducts, but that fat accumulation per se does not interfere with the superovulatory response, which was on a par with that of thinner animals.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this study, most of the correlations between embryo production and subcutaneous fat deposition were low, indicating random sources of variation, but animals with more back fat tended to produce fewer transferable embryos. This finding ties in with the reports that 15 experimental obese cows with an average fat thickness of 3-4 cm at the back required more services per conception than cows with an average backfat thickness of 1-73 cm (Arnett, Holland and Totusek, 1971), and that 10% lower conception rates at first service were obtained in obese heifers following spontaneous ovulation (Wiltbank, Bond, Warnick, Davis, Cook, Reynolds and Hazen, 1965). The extreme fat accumulation observed in a few animals suggested that accumulation in the regions of the ovarian bursae and oviducts can interfere with or prevent normal ovum transport into or through the oviducts, but that fat accumulation per se does not interfere with the superovulatory response, which was on a par with that of thinner animals.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Heifers were slaughtered and those on increased intake had a greater udder weight and a larger proportion ofthat weight was fat. Arnett et al (1971) studied sets of twin heifers developed at a rate of 0.34 kg/d or at a rate designed to induce a high degree of body fatness. The overdeveloped twins were 30% heavier than more appropriately developed twins at first mating and maintained this difference through their third calving season.…”
Section: Excess Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the cows fed CON became over conditioned and this negatively impacted milk production and therefore calf weaning weight. This is supported by Arnett et al (1971) in an investigation into the effects of obesity in beef females. Normal body conditioned cows produced significantly more milk over three lactations than obese beef cows and, in addition, calves of the normal conditioned cows tended to gain weight more rapidly and be heavier at weaning than calves who nursed from obese cows.…”
Section: Calf Performancementioning
confidence: 69%