1965
DOI: 10.2527/jas1965.241239x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Effects of Lactose on Protein Utilization in the Baby Pig

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no significant difference between glucose and dextrin. This result is in contrast with reports that pigs fed diets containing lactose had higher (PO.05) apparent N digestibility (Sewell and West, 1965). This improvement may be caused by the high rate of screen of lactase, the enzyme responsible for lactose degradation, present in the digestive system of the young pig (Corring et al, 1978).…”
Section: Nutrient Digestibilitycontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there was no significant difference between glucose and dextrin. This result is in contrast with reports that pigs fed diets containing lactose had higher (PO.05) apparent N digestibility (Sewell and West, 1965). This improvement may be caused by the high rate of screen of lactase, the enzyme responsible for lactose degradation, present in the digestive system of the young pig (Corring et al, 1978).…”
Section: Nutrient Digestibilitycontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The best crude protein (CP) digestibility was found in pigs fed diet A, and the worst was found in pigs fed diet E; those for diets B, C and D were intermediate. This result is supported by reports (Sewell and West, 1965) that pigs fed diets containing lactose had higher (P<0.05) apparent N digestibility. During the third week postweaning (phase II), there were no significant differences in any nutrient digestibilities among treatments.…”
Section: Nutrient Digestibilitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This lack of agreement could be a reflection of the shorter experimental period and smaller number of animals used in the lllinois work. Moreover, in view of recent work by Sewell and West (1965) in which the advantages of lactose fed in combination with soyabean protein were outlined, it may also be due in part to the different source of protein used in the diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research exists regarding the benefits of lactose on the growth performance of weanling pigs (Sewell and West, 1965;Mahan, 1992;Mahan and Newton, 1993;Nessmith et al, 1997;O'Doherty et al, 2004). Lactose has been shown to act as a specific substrate for lactobacilli (Pierce et al, 2006), increase intake (O'Doherty et al, 2004), slow digesta flow rates (Buraczewski et al, 1971) and influence organic acid production in the lower gut of the pig (Friend et al, 1962) all of which potentially benefits the host in the stressful post-weaning period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%