1992
DOI: 10.1109/34.120328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some defects in finite-difference edge finders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a finite difference edge finder is applied to compute the gradient magnitude. The optimal finite difference edge finder for the Canny edge detection algorithm is given in (Fleck, 1992), which we use in our evaluation. Then non-maxima suppression (peak detection) is applied to the gradient magnitude image that retains only those points at the top of the ridge, whilst suppressing others.…”
Section: Evaluation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a finite difference edge finder is applied to compute the gradient magnitude. The optimal finite difference edge finder for the Canny edge detection algorithm is given in (Fleck, 1992), which we use in our evaluation. Then non-maxima suppression (peak detection) is applied to the gradient magnitude image that retains only those points at the top of the ridge, whilst suppressing others.…”
Section: Evaluation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each realisation of the neural network weights, a vector of actual outputs is produced Oa = N(w) xIp (38) The learning objective is to solve this equation in order to find N(w), allowing the definition of a weight set WL such that Op = 0Q(WL) =N(WL) X lp (39) As an algebraic solution is not known, an iterative solution was proposed by [145] as the minimisation of the function E(w) = 2115P -Öa(w)II (40) Among the different techniques for minimising a function of 9, back propagation is based on a steepest descent technique.…”
Section: Learning Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) The resulting method is even more redundant than in the one-dimensional case: the method adds a considerable amount of spurious edges, as observed in [6,10]. Indeed, not all zero crossing of the regularized Laplacian, S η N f are necessarily extrema of ∇S η N [f ], which end up as "false" edges despite being zero crossings of (2.10).…”
Section: Zero Crossing Edge Detection For Incomplete Datamentioning
confidence: 99%