1961
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOME DATA ON MATCHING BEHAVIOR IN THE PIGEON1

Abstract: In matching behavior, the subject is first presented with a standard stimulus, and then required to select the corresponding stimulus from a set (usually two) of comparison stimuli. There has been increasing contemporary interest in this situation (Blough, 1957(Blough, , 1959Ferster, 1960), perhaps because it shares a number of common dimensions with several other important research areas. If the number of standard stimuli is made large, the matching procedure relates closely to the "learning set" problems of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
114
2
25

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
114
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, early tests with pigeons uniformly failed to find MTS abstract-concept learning Cumming & Berryman, 1961;Cumming et al, 1965;D'Amato et al, 1985;Farthing & Opuda, 1974;Holmes, 1979). Indeed, these failures of MTS abstract-concept learning by pigeons provided a major stimulus for Premack's (1978) article.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, early tests with pigeons uniformly failed to find MTS abstract-concept learning Cumming & Berryman, 1961;Cumming et al, 1965;D'Amato et al, 1985;Farthing & Opuda, 1974;Holmes, 1979). Indeed, these failures of MTS abstract-concept learning by pigeons provided a major stimulus for Premack's (1978) article.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers studying nonhuman conditional discrimination performances also report that many trials are needed for acquisition. For example, Cumming and Berryman (1961) examined match-to-sample performance in pigeons, using only two choice stimuli. Acquisition at the 90% accuracy level occurred after a minimum of approximately 350 trials for each relation for one bird, and after a maximum of approximately 560 trials for each relation for two other birds.…”
Section: Interobserver Agreementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one were to adopt the hypothesis that SB verbal behavior may be composed of TB components (Dugdale & Lowe, 1990;Lowenkron, 1991), one would expect to see the results described above. Given no verbal skills with which to use in learning SB relations, it would be necessary for a participant to learn a conditional discrimination to select correctly, which has been demonstrated in nonhuman research, but often takes a considerable amount of time (Cumming & Berryman, 1961;Shafer, 1993). An alternative to this is that a participant might learn a topographical response and then have it function as an aide in responding correctly in the SB condition.…”
Section: Topography-based and Selection-based Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%