1966
DOI: 10.3758/bf03328276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some correlates of inhibition-facilitation effect on reaction-time due to unexpected increase in stimulus intensity

Abstract: Ss who showed an inhibitory effect in reacting to an auditory stimulus, the intensitv of which was increased unexpectedly, were compared with Ss who showed a facilitatory effect in reacting to a similar stimulus. No difference was noticed between the two groups in introversion, anxietyneuroticism and autonomic lability measures. There was a significant negative correlation between latency of reaction to a weak stimulus and inhibition-facilitation effect. This result is discussed in terms of the curvilinear per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On closer examination, 58 or 94% of the Ss, instead of predicted 100%, were facilitators. However, forward response (Purohit, 1966) and inward response in this experiment. See text for details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On closer examination, 58 or 94% of the Ss, instead of predicted 100%, were facilitators. However, forward response (Purohit, 1966) and inward response in this experiment. See text for details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In a recent paper (Purohit, 1966) it was reported that Ss whose reaction time to a weak stimulus (RTw) was long, showed facilitatory effect (RTs -RTw = -) in their reaction time to a strong stimulus (RTs), the intensity of which was increased unexpectedly. Conversely, Ss whose RTw was short showed inhibitory effect (RTs-RTw=+) in their RTs in the same situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%