2012
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2011.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some comments on MacKay's Lanchester mixed forces model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reflect that a commander may have a choice in how to distribute fire at the start of a battle but thereafter it evolves according to the proportion of units of a particular type. This was challenged by (Liu et al, 2012) who allowed for targets to change during battle as adversary units were eliminated. This also was questioned by MacKay, noting that in the fog-and-friction of war, such reallocation of targets may be unrealistic after the battle has begun (MacKay, 2012).…”
Section: Status Of Lanchester Combat Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reflect that a commander may have a choice in how to distribute fire at the start of a battle but thereafter it evolves according to the proportion of units of a particular type. This was challenged by (Liu et al, 2012) who allowed for targets to change during battle as adversary units were eliminated. This also was questioned by MacKay, noting that in the fog-and-friction of war, such reallocation of targets may be unrealistic after the battle has begun (MacKay, 2012).…”
Section: Status Of Lanchester Combat Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%