2000
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2000.510.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Comments on Infraspecific Classification of Cultivars of Melon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
151
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
151
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This new categorization was aided by Jeffrey methodology (1980) for classification of melon subspecies and botanical varieties (PITRAT; HANELT;HAMMER, 2000). Thus, a representation of the most contrasting phenotypes is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This new categorization was aided by Jeffrey methodology (1980) for classification of melon subspecies and botanical varieties (PITRAT; HANELT;HAMMER, 2000). Thus, a representation of the most contrasting phenotypes is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The botanical var. chandalak, originally from Central Asia, showed consistent characteristics, with andromonoecious sexual expression, greenish pulp, small seeds and climacteric fruit (PITRAT; HANELT;HAMMER, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations