2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/8492072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Coefficient Inequalities of q-Starlike Functions Associated with Conic Domain Defined by q-Derivative

Abstract: This article deals with q-starlike functions associated with conic domains, defined by Janowski functions. It generalizes the recent study of q-starlike functions while associating it with the conic domains. Certain renowned coefficient inequalities in connection with the previously known ones have been included in this work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p j (j = 1, 2, 3) are positive and are the coefficients of the functions p k (z) defined by (6). Each of the above results is sharp for the function g (z) given by…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where p j (j = 1, 2, 3) are positive and are the coefficients of the functions p k (z) defined by (6). Each of the above results is sharp for the function g (z) given by…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In fact, subjected to the conic domain Ω k (k 0), Kanas and Wiśniowska (see [3,4]; see also [6]) studied the corresponding class k-S T of k-starlike functions in U (see Definition 1 below). For fixed k, Ω k represents the conic region bounded successively by the imaginary axis (k = 0), by a parabola (k = 1), by the right branch of a hyperbola (0 < k < 1), and by an ellipse (k > 1).…”
Section: Introduction and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, when q → 1, then, the class k − U K q (λ, α, β, γ) reduces into the well-known class that is defined in (see [40]).…”
Section: Definition 1 ([35]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in 2018, Kwon et al [38] improved the bound of Zaprawa for f ∈ S * and proved that |H 3,1 ( f )| ≤ 8/9, but it is not yet the best possible. The authors in [39][40][41] contributed in a similar direction by generalizing different families of univalent functions with respect to symmetric points. In 2018, Kowalczyk et al [42] and Lecko et al [43] obtained the sharp inequalities:…”
Section: Introduction and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%