2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some causes of inter-laboratory variation in the results of comet assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“… Sirota et al. (2014) studied inter-laboratory variation of comet assay factors, like slide brands, duration of alkali treatment and electrophoresis conditions, and they found that laboratory differences were associated with electrophoresis conditions, especially the temperature during alkaline electrophoresis, which affects the rate of conversion of alkali labile sites to single stranded breaks ( Sirota et al. , 2014 ).…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation-associated Dna Damage Radiotherapy and Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Sirota et al. (2014) studied inter-laboratory variation of comet assay factors, like slide brands, duration of alkali treatment and electrophoresis conditions, and they found that laboratory differences were associated with electrophoresis conditions, especially the temperature during alkaline electrophoresis, which affects the rate of conversion of alkali labile sites to single stranded breaks ( Sirota et al. , 2014 ).…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation-associated Dna Damage Radiotherapy and Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, images were opened in CometScore software and the individual cells were scored using the scoring tool which automatically measures the % tail DNA and olive tail moment for that particular cell. Approximately, 100 cells per gel were analysed [28,44,48].…”
Section: Alkaline Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the classification, HiComet could identify around 90% of non-overlapped cells in one comet assay image. In order to evaluate DNA damages correctly, we calculated the heterogeneity of response [ 24 26 ] (e.g., the distribution of % DNA in the tail). When the true distribution of % DNA in the tail is normal, the discarded 10% cells would cause only 1.7% decrease in the confidence level with the same confidence interval (e.g., 95% confidence interval using 50 comets = 93.7% confidence interval using 41 comets).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%