Does Darwinism generally, and human sociobiology in particular, lead to an unwarranted (and possibly socially offensive) determinism? I argue that one must separate out different senses of determinism, and that once one has done this, a Darwinian approach to human nature can be seen to shed important light on our intuitions about free will, constraint, and control.Keywords: ogy.Darwinism; determinism; free will; human sociobiol-Charles Darwin's great work On the Origin of Species was published in 1859. Only now, however, are we starting to appreciate and explore the full implications of Darwin's message: that all organisms including ourselves are the product of a long, slow natural process of evolution brought on primarily by the mechanism of natural selection. It is true, indeed, that Darwin himself appreciated the significance of his work. Particularly in his later publication Descent of Man (1871), Darwin showed how he thought his theory impinges upon the most distinctive facets of our natures-including our claim to be moral beings. Yet for many reasons-the incompleteness of the theory, outside hostility, and especially in this century the growth of the social sciences-few felt ready or able to respond to the full challenge and opportunity shown by the Origin.Hence, even as the twentieth century draws to an end, most people are quite indifferent to their evolutionary origins. Although in the intellectual community there are few if any who take literally the story of Genesis, the general presumption is that humans are distinct and unique, as if we were in fact the favored creation of a good god some 6,000 years ago rather than modified monkeys. Homo sapiens is thought to be beyond biology in all important respects.