1918
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.64448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some biological and control studies of Gastrophilus haemorrhoidalis and other bots of horses /

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1919
1919
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…G. nasalis flies mainly 144 deposit the eggs on the hairs under the jaws, and it is known that horses protect 145 themselves from the flies by laying their heads upon the back each other (Dove, 1918). 146…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. nasalis flies mainly 144 deposit the eggs on the hairs under the jaws, and it is known that horses protect 145 themselves from the flies by laying their heads upon the back each other (Dove, 1918). 146…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the egg form of G.intestinalis and G.nasalis appears the same in eggs examined from females nearly 70 years apart in age. Eggs of most of the species have been illustrated to some degree by a number of authors (Collinge, 1910;Dinulescu, 1932;Dove, 1918;Grunin, 1969;Hadwen & Cameron, 1918;Hinton, 1981;Paramonow, 1948;Tatchell, 1961;Wells & Knipling, 1938;Zumpt & Paterson, 1953). In general the egg of each species diagrammed has been in close agreement with others of its kind even though the authors may have been separated temporally and geographically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have adapted to a larval life in the alimentary tract of Equidae (Zumpt 1965; Grunin 1969; Colwell et al 2006), and their presence can lead to serious injuries or even death of the host (Hall and Wall 1995; Sequeira et al 2001; Colwell et al 2006; Bezdekova et al 2007; Getachew et al 2012). Because of their great veterinary importance, Gasterophilus species have received considerable attention since the early 1800s (Clark 1815; Dove 1918; Patton 1937; Zumpt and Paterson 1953; James 1974; Otranto et al 2005a, b; Colwell et al 2006, 2007; Zhang et al 2016; Liu et al 2016; Huang et al 2017; Li et al 2018). A total of more than 40 species-group names have been proposed for what is here recognized as nine valid species because of extensive intraspecific variation (Zumpt 1965; Grunin 1969; Pont 1980; Soós and Minář 1986; Cogley 1991a), and a series of misidentifications can be ascribed to their similar larval morphology (Colwell et al 2007; Li et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%