2011
DOI: 10.1386/josc.2.2.275_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some attitudes and trajectories in screenwriting research

Abstract: An edited extract from a keynote address at the third Screenwriting Research Network conference, ‘Screenwriting Research: History, Theory and Practice’, at the University of Copenhagen in 2010,1 this piece focuses on what I have termed the ‘object problem’ in screenwriting research. I pay specific attention to how we might address the object problem by thinking about different attitudes and trajectories in screenwriting research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wisdom of this approach is that it takes into account the organic nature of screenwriting practices, including the changing status of both a film and script at every stage of the process of production. This Foucauldian approach, dubbed "discourse frame" by Maras, is one that takes into account the key moments when screenwriting standards were debated, refined and normalized, and it analyses screenwriting on many fronts -such as history, practice, and theory-which it considers to be tightly bound (see also Maras, 2011;Chiarulli, 2014). Thus, the history of screenwriting is closely bound to the techniques applied by cinema practitioners (Fumagalli, 2020).…”
Section: Creative Process Creative Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wisdom of this approach is that it takes into account the organic nature of screenwriting practices, including the changing status of both a film and script at every stage of the process of production. This Foucauldian approach, dubbed "discourse frame" by Maras, is one that takes into account the key moments when screenwriting standards were debated, refined and normalized, and it analyses screenwriting on many fronts -such as history, practice, and theory-which it considers to be tightly bound (see also Maras, 2011;Chiarulli, 2014). Thus, the history of screenwriting is closely bound to the techniques applied by cinema practitioners (Fumagalli, 2020).…”
Section: Creative Process Creative Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…My approach to screenwriting research was inclusive and could well have been mapped onto several of the attitudes and trajectories identified by Steven Maras (2011), had such a critical appraisal of the discipline been available in the early 1990s. The multi-strandedness of Written for the Screen accounts for the brevity and historical or theoretical underdevelopment of some of its parts, but I would argue -having looked across the current spectrum of researchthat the central questions and preoccupations still hold interest, having led, in the meantime, to more sustained and diversified theorization under various framings, such as history, authorship, culture, philosophy and poetics (Maras 2009;Price 2010;Nelmes 2011;Boon 2008;Nannicelli 2013;Macdonald 2013).…”
Section: Reading and Writing As/in Screenwriting Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-strandedness of Written for the Screen accounts for the brevity and historical or theoretical underdevelopment of some of its parts, but I would argue -having looked across the current spectrum of researchthat the central questions and preoccupations still hold interest, having led, in the meantime, to more sustained and diversified theorization under various framings, such as history, authorship, culture, philosophy and poetics (Maras 2009;Price 2010;Nelmes 2011;Boon 2008;Nannicelli 2013;Macdonald 2013). Even though I engaged only peripherally with the more abstract concerns and debates about the screenplay's invisibility, disappearance or 'ghostliness' (Price 2010: 50-53;Marshall 2008), I addressed the specificities of authorship, the relationship between text and performance, the verbal system that accommodates a multi-channelled medium, and the cinematic-technical and cinematic-literary competence of different readerships.…”
Section: Reading and Writing As/in Screenwriting Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This survey not only shows the variation inherent in these cultural products but also pinpoints areas that are worth investigating more closely and in depth. From the product perspective, studies in [20], [21] show that there is no final script on which to base firm conclusions and pointing to the importance of other texts that refer to the screen idea. However, according to [22] this object problem affects not only TV scripts, but also television works, primarily because of media convergence, fan texts, and serialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%