1965
DOI: 10.1063/1.1696631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Aspects of the Energetics and Kinetics of Electrochemical Proton Transfer

Abstract: A model for low temperature electrochemical proton transfer: Temperature and isotope effects on kinetic parameters J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9523 (1997); 10.1063/1.473853Flow-drift tube measurements of kinetic energy dependences of some exothermic proton transfer rate constants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This often-quoted conclusion was originally made,7 and subsequently reaffirmed,8-10-32 by workers primarily concerned with the proton discharge reaction. As the formation of the activated state for this particular electrode reaction has been considered (at least under some conditions) to involve proton transfer from HsO"8 to the metal surface with only subsequent charge neutralization,32 theoretical calculations of the barrier height using this model need to be compared with experimental ideal enthalpies of activation evaluated for the condition = 0, where the presence of the electrode will not affect the energetics of the proton transfer act.10- 32 However, for simple electrochemical reactions controlled by electron rather than atom transfer, quite a different situation is encountered. At the standard potential, E°, for the overall reaction 13, the standard electrochemical potential of the reacting electron, will equal the difference in the standard electrochemical potentials for There is a clear parallel between the heterogeneous and homogeneous "reductants" M(e~,E°) and Red* in that both serve to maintain the standard free energy of the overall reactions 13 and 15 at zero at all temperatures.17 As Marcus has shown,17 a close parallel therefore exists between the standard free energies of activation for corresponding electrochemical and chemical self-exchange reactions when the former are evaluated at E°.…”
Section: IVmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This often-quoted conclusion was originally made,7 and subsequently reaffirmed,8-10-32 by workers primarily concerned with the proton discharge reaction. As the formation of the activated state for this particular electrode reaction has been considered (at least under some conditions) to involve proton transfer from HsO"8 to the metal surface with only subsequent charge neutralization,32 theoretical calculations of the barrier height using this model need to be compared with experimental ideal enthalpies of activation evaluated for the condition = 0, where the presence of the electrode will not affect the energetics of the proton transfer act.10- 32 However, for simple electrochemical reactions controlled by electron rather than atom transfer, quite a different situation is encountered. At the standard potential, E°, for the overall reaction 13, the standard electrochemical potential of the reacting electron, will equal the difference in the standard electrochemical potentials for There is a clear parallel between the heterogeneous and homogeneous "reductants" M(e~,E°) and Red* in that both serve to maintain the standard free energy of the overall reactions 13 and 15 at zero at all temperatures.17 As Marcus has shown,17 a close parallel therefore exists between the standard free energies of activation for corresponding electrochemical and chemical self-exchange reactions when the former are evaluated at E°.…”
Section: IVmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is rather high for this type of vibration (e.g. in I;I-11;-us,, = 600 cm-I) and is attributed to the calculated result that the (I-Ig-I I-OH2)+ coii~plex is asymmetric (22).…”
Section: Ratios Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been she\\-n to predict activation energies to ~vithin &2 ltcal mole-' for hydrogen trmsfer reactions and is therefore considered to be superior to the semien~pirical method. The syn~metrical stretching mode for the electroche~i~ical proton transfer was found (22) to have a frequency u s , , = 1 503 cm-l. This is rather high for this type of vibration (e.g.…”
Section: Ratios Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite some serious objections to either method (26)(27)(28), there is no doubt as to their general usefulness. In order to construct the potential energy surface for an electrochemical reaction, one would have to know the "real" activation energy so that the adjustable parameters in the theory could be properly utilized (23,(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: _ Qd30+ )2mentioning
confidence: 99%