2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.023519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of tachyon field cosmology

Abstract: We study inflation, perturbations, non-gaussinity and late-time cosmological dynamics of a tachyon field both minimally and non-minimally coupled to gravity. By analyzing the parameters space of the model, the viability of the model in confrontation with recent observational data is considered. In a dynamical system technique, we study the phase space dynamics of both minimally and non-minimally coupled tachyon field. We find the fixed points (lines in our setup) and explore their stability. Also, we perform a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(129 reference statements)
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the figure shows, a tachyon field model with potentials such as a linear potential V ∼ θ [15], a quadratic potential V ∼ θ 2 , a potential as V ∼ θ 3 , a quartic potential V ∼ θ 4 , a potential motivated by axion monodromy, as V ∼ θ 2 3 [16] and an exponential potential V ∼ e −θ is totally outside the Planck+WMAP+BICEP2+BAO data. We note that a minimally coupled tachyon field inflation with potentials θ 2 and e −θ was supported by the Planck2013 data [7]. Now we see that a minimal tachyon model is ruled out by the Planck+WMAP+BICEP2+BAO joint data.…”
Section: Minimally Coupled Tachyon Field Inflationmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As the figure shows, a tachyon field model with potentials such as a linear potential V ∼ θ [15], a quadratic potential V ∼ θ 2 , a potential as V ∼ θ 3 , a quartic potential V ∼ θ 4 , a potential motivated by axion monodromy, as V ∼ θ 2 3 [16] and an exponential potential V ∼ e −θ is totally outside the Planck+WMAP+BICEP2+BAO data. We note that a minimally coupled tachyon field inflation with potentials θ 2 and e −θ was supported by the Planck2013 data [7]. Now we see that a minimal tachyon model is ruled out by the Planck+WMAP+BICEP2+BAO joint data.…”
Section: Minimally Coupled Tachyon Field Inflationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Once again, we see that a minimally coupled tachyon field inflation with mentioned potentials is not supported by this joint dataset. It should be noticed that, with an exponential potential the running of the scalar spectral index is far from the observational data and is not shown in the figure. A minimally coupled tachyon model with an intermediate potential (V = b θ −β with β = 4l−4 l−2 , where l is defined by a = a 0 exp(ϑt l ), 0 < l < 1) [7] is also quite outside the observational region and is not shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Minimally Coupled Tachyon Field Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations