Some applications of solid phase micro extraction (SPME) in the analysis of pesticide residues in food

Volante, Marco; Cattaneo, Manuela; Bianchi, Mascia; Zoccola, Gabriele

doi:10.1080/03601239809373144

Cited by 34 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Inhalation of volatile pesticides near treated crops is also excluded, since this is considered a minor route of exposure for most pesticides (Geoghegan et al 2013). Traditional as well as novel methods of risk assessment will be used and compared in their predictions (Volante et al 1998;Korta et al 2001aKorta et al , 2002Martel and Zeggane 2002;Martel et al 2007). For a correct risk assessment, it is important to identify the main residue chemicals used for treating the bees in their natural environment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rapid and Reliable Method for Analyzing Acaricides in Honey-Based Products

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The acaricide use (Amitraz, Bromopropylate, Coumaphos, Tau-fluvalinate, and Fipronil) is a common worldwide practice in honey cultivation for protect the production. Nevertheless, their presence decreases honey safety and quality and affects the human health. Therefore, it is important to set up an easy, reliable, and rapid analytical method for determining such compounds in bee's products (honey, molasses, and royal jelly). The method, based on solid-phase extraction using Carbograph 1 as sorbent and analysis by gas chromatography coupled with ion trap mass spectrometer detector (GC/IT-MS), allows very efficient recoveries ranging between 99 and 106 % with relative standard deviation (RSD) ≤5 % for the standard solution and between 98 and 102 % with RSD ≤9 % for samples spiked with 40 ng g −1 of each acaricide. The adsorption isotherms and breakthrough curves for Carbograph 1 sugary solution are reported. The instrumental analytical protocol has been found to yield a linear calibration in the range 10-300 ng g −1 with r 2 ≥0.991. The limits of detection vary between 1.4 and 5.3 ng g −1 (RSD ≤4 %), whereas the limits of quantification range between 4.6 and 9.4 ng g −1 (RSD ≤6 %); the intra-day and inter-day repeatabilities as RSD were below 9 and 15 %, respectively. The analytical method developed has been applied to several commercial and home-made bee products.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rapid and Reliable Method for Analyzing Acaricides in Honey-Based Products

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Use of disposable extraction columns including C 18 [14,15,20], Florisil [11,13], and silica with activated charcoal [22] was attempted. Supercritical fluid extraction [12] and solidphase micro-extraction [19] have been applied to the analysis of fluvalinate and amitraz in honey, respectively. Ultrasound can be considered another alternative for solid sample pretreatment because the energy imparted facilitates and accelerates some steps, such as dissolution, fusion, and leaching, among others [23] and this method resolves the problems of solvent and time consumption [24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rapid and sensitive determination of two degradation products of flumethrin in honey by ultrasonically assisted extraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection

Zhou

Xue²,

et al. 2007

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rapid and sensitive determination of two degradation products of flumethrin in honey by ultrasonically assisted extraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection A rapid and sensitive method for the determination of 4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzaldehyde cyanohydrin (FPBC) and 4-fluoro-3-phenoxy-benzaldehyde (FPB) in honey samples using ultrasonically assisted extraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC -ECD) has been developed. The different factors affecting the efficiency of the extraction were carefully optimized. The honey sample was extracted with a mixture of hexane and dichloromethane (v/v, 1:1) utilizing the ultrasonically assisted technique and cleaned up by solid-phase extraction on Oasis HLB cartridges. The eluate was evaporated to dryness and residues were reconstituted to 1.0 mL with hexane and determined by GC -ECD. The calibration curves of fortified samples showed acceptable linear response (R 2 A0.99) over a range of 3 -100 ng/g for FPBC and FPB in seven replicate determinations of six concentrations, respectively, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a lack-of-fit test was performed to validate the regression data. Overall average recoveries ranged from 90.9 to 106.2% for honey samples. The detection limits were 0.9 ng/g for FPBC and 1.0 ng/g for FPB, respectively. This method can be successfully applied to routine determination of two degradation products of flumethrin in honey samples.

show abstract

“…These methods are usually time-consuming and involve laborious steps that employ large amounts of organic solvents, making them impractical for routine analysis. A number of procedures based on solid phase extraction (SPE) [8,9,10,11], solid phase microextraction (SPME) [12,13,14] and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [15] have been developed to avoid the general drawbacks associated with organic solvent extraction of pesticides from honey and honeybee samples.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rapid screening of organophosphorus pesticides in honey and bees by liquid chromatography—Mass spectrometry

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryTwentydwo organophosphorus pesticide residues were simultaneously determined in honey and honeybee samples by extraction procedures based on solid-phase and liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass in positive and negative ionization modes. Pesticides in honeybee samples were extracted by matrix solid phase dispersion with Cls silica and subsequently elutecl with a mixture of clichloromethane-methanol (85:15, v/v). The average recoveries from spiked honeybees (0.5 -10 Ixg g 1) ranged from 76% for coumaphos to 100% for omethoate, with relative standard deviations bef,,veen 3 and 17%. Limits of detection were <0.13 I~g g 1 and limits of quantification were <0.43 I~g g 1. Honey samples required only dilution with water prior to solid phase extraction (SPE) with Cls silica and further elution with ethyl acetate, methanol and clichloromethane. Mean recoveries from spiked honey (0.1 -5 I~g g 1) were bef,,veen 14% for omethoate to 102% for azinphos ethyl, with relative standard deviations ranging from 2 to 17%. Limits of detection were from 0.01 to 0.24 I~g g 1 and limits of quantification from 0.03 to 0.80 I~g g 1.

show abstract

Some applications of solid phase micro extraction (SPME) in the analysis of pesticide residues in food

Cited by 34 publications

References 0 publications

Rapid and Reliable Method for Analyzing Acaricides in Honey-Based Products

Rapid and Reliable Method for Analyzing Acaricides in Honey-Based Products

Rapid and sensitive determination of two degradation products of flumethrin in honey by ultrasonically assisted extraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection

Rapid screening of organophosphorus pesticides in honey and bees by liquid chromatography—Mass spectrometry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About