1996
DOI: 10.4064/aa-77-4-315-337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some applications of large sieve in Riemann surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After Lemmas and , the proof of Theorems and boils down to approximating sharp cut‐offs by smooth kernels and estimating S‐HC transforms. Following , with a hyperbolic version of a classical Euclidean device, it is possible to reduce the problem to estimate the S‐HC transform of the characteristic function of an interval (which is done in [, Lemma 2.4]). With this idea in mind, we write χV and hV, respectively, for the characteristic function of [0,V] and its S‐HC transform: χVfalse(xfalse)=left1leftif4.pt0x<V,left0leftotherwiseandhVfalse(tfalse)={u(z,i)V}y1/2+itdμfalse(zfalse).The slow decay of hV would cause serious convergence problems when applying the spectral theorem.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After Lemmas and , the proof of Theorems and boils down to approximating sharp cut‐offs by smooth kernels and estimating S‐HC transforms. Following , with a hyperbolic version of a classical Euclidean device, it is possible to reduce the problem to estimate the S‐HC transform of the characteristic function of an interval (which is done in [, Lemma 2.4]). With this idea in mind, we write χV and hV, respectively, for the characteristic function of [0,V] and its S‐HC transform: χVfalse(xfalse)=left1leftif4.pt0x<V,left0leftotherwiseandhVfalse(tfalse)={u(z,i)V}y1/2+itdμfalse(zfalse).The slow decay of hV would cause serious convergence problems when applying the spectral theorem.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key argument is a simple one and it is summarized in the following result. We merely sketch the details of the proof because it is essentially contained in that of [, Lemma 2.3] (see also [, § 5] and [, Lemma 2.2]). Lemma For 0<v<V consider the function F:double-struckH2R given by Ffalse(z,wfalse)=14πvdouble-struckHχVufalse(z,ζfalse)χvufalse(ζ,wfalse)dμfalse(ζfalse).Then there exists f:[0,)R such that F(z,w)=f(u(z,w)) and χVfχV+whereV±=()V(1+v)±v(1+V)2.Moreover, the S‐HC transform of f is hVhv.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exponent has not been improved but the natural conjecture (supported by average results [4]) is α = 1/2 + ε for every ε > 0.…”
Section: The Visible Lattice Point Problemmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is possible to write an explicit formula for the distance d (see [10] and [9] for it and its geometrical interpretation) that in the orbit of z = i acquires an especially simple form (see [4])…”
Section: Preliminaries and Symmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not investigate these but refer to [9,Theorem 12.1], [13,6,16,2]. To every conjugacy class {γ} of Γ corresponds a unique closed oriented geodesic of length l(γ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%