2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13660-019-2030-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some algorithms for classes of split feasibility problems involving paramonotone equilibria and convex optimization

Abstract: In this paper, we first introduce a new algorithm which involves projecting each iteration to solve a split feasibility problem with paramonotone equilibria and using unconstrained convex optimization. The strong convergence of the proposed algorithm is presented. Second, we also revisit this split feasibility problem and replace the unconstrained convex optimization by a constrained convex optimization. We introduce some algorithms for two different types of objective function of the constrained convex optimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operator T = P C (I − λ∇f ) is well known to be nonexpansive (see [14,30] and the references therein). Several authors have have considered different iterative algorithm for constrained convex minimization problems (see [4,9,13,19,34] and the references therein). We now give our main results Theorem 8.2.…”
Section: S Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operator T = P C (I − λ∇f ) is well known to be nonexpansive (see [14,30] and the references therein). Several authors have have considered different iterative algorithm for constrained convex minimization problems (see [4,9,13,19,34] and the references therein). We now give our main results Theorem 8.2.…”
Section: S Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, it is attractive by many researchers. There are increasing interests in studying solution methods for this problem such as the hybrid steepest descent methods of Yamada [33] where S i (i ∈ I) are nonexpansive mappings, subgradienttype method of Iiduka [20] and other [34,15,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%