1998
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1998.0195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daly-Jones et al [19] conclude that videoconferencing enhances interpersonal awareness. Although team members do not share the same physical location during videoconferencing, they can see and hear one another (feelings, tones, gestures, etc.)…”
Section: Videoconferencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daly-Jones et al [19] conclude that videoconferencing enhances interpersonal awareness. Although team members do not share the same physical location during videoconferencing, they can see and hear one another (feelings, tones, gestures, etc.)…”
Section: Videoconferencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This attribute implies that systems should avoid forcing users to substitute one sensory mode for another. For example, although audio communication is closely related to collaborative task accomplishment, visual information is a strong source of socio-emotional, task and contextual knowledge (Bly, Harrison, & Irwin, 1993;Monk & Watts 1995;Daly Jones, Monk, &Watts;1998), and its absence in a collaboration system would diminish the effectiveness of the system. In the nM system, haptic feedback is also provided when the microscope tip is pushed against a sample.…”
Section: Sensory Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While video enabled communication offers a number of benefits over voice only communication, it is still lacking compared to face-to-face interactions [1]. For example remotely located team members are less included in cooperative activities than co-located team members [1], and have fewer conversational turns and speaking time in group conversations [2]. Suggested reasons for these disparities are a lack of social presence of these remote group members, reduced engagement, and reduced awareness of actions [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%