Somatosensory omissions reveal action‐related predictive processing

Abstract

The intricate relation between action and somatosensory perception has been studied extensively in the past decades. Generally, a forward model is thought to predict the somatosensory consequences of an action. These models propose that when an action is reliably coupled to a tactile stimulus, unexpected absence of the stimulus should elicit prediction error. Although such omission responses have been demonstrated in the auditory modality, it remains unknown whether this mechanism generalizes across modalities. This study therefore aimed to record action‐induced somatosensory omission responses using EEG in humans. Self‐paced button presses were coupled to somatosensory stimuli in 88% of trials, allowing a prediction, or in 50% of trials, not allowing a prediction. In the 88% condition, stimulus omission resulted in a neural response consisting of multiple components, as revealed by temporal principal component analysis. The oN1 response suggests similar sensory sources as stimulus‐evoked activity, but an origin outside primary cortex. Subsequent oN2 and oP3 responses, as previously observed in the auditory domain, likely reflect modality‐unspecific higher order processes. Together, findings straightforwardly demonstrate somatosensory predictions during action and provide evidence for a partially amodal mechanism of prediction error generation.

Carrier‐frequency specific omission‐related neural activity in ordered sound sequences is independent of omission‐predictability

“…Based on previous findings on omission responses, coupling the (omitted) stimuli to an action or another stimulus might elicit stronger omission responses (e.g. Dercksen et al, 2020;Dercksen et al, 2023;Stekelenburg & Vroomen, 2015).…”

“…Such predictive processing can be seen in different modalities, for example, touch (e.g. Dercksen et al, 2023;Yu et al, 2022), vision (Goujon et al, 2015) and hearing (Winkler et al, 2009).…”