2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatosensory map expansion and altered processing of tactile inputs in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 298 publications
(289 reference statements)
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, increased excitability along the intracortical projections facilitates the integration of sensory information across whisk cycles such that Sert −/− rats required fewer whisker touch and showed faster response times compared Sert +/+ rats. These results are in agreement with recent observations in a mouse of Fragile X syndrome (Juczewski et al 2016) where hyperexcitability of the primary somatosensory neurons have been well characterized (Zhang et al 2014; Juczewski et al 2016). Collectively, the findings point to an inverse correlation between somatosensory cortical excitability and the duration of tactile sampling required for successful object localization by whisker contacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, increased excitability along the intracortical projections facilitates the integration of sensory information across whisk cycles such that Sert −/− rats required fewer whisker touch and showed faster response times compared Sert +/+ rats. These results are in agreement with recent observations in a mouse of Fragile X syndrome (Juczewski et al 2016) where hyperexcitability of the primary somatosensory neurons have been well characterized (Zhang et al 2014; Juczewski et al 2016). Collectively, the findings point to an inverse correlation between somatosensory cortical excitability and the duration of tactile sampling required for successful object localization by whisker contacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…7 A ). Tactile exploration of the target platform was observed using high-speed infrared imaging (Voigts et al 2008; Pang et al 2011; Juczewski et al 2016) and tactile evidence (i.e., duration of whisker contact; Fig. 7 B ) before successful object localization was quantified using video recordings (see Materials and Methods; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whisker system, with its modular organization along the whiskerto-barrel pathway as well as the rich behavioral repertoire of whisker dependent tasks (e.g. (Filipkowski et al, 2000;Guic-Robles et al, 1992;Jabłońska and Skangiel-Kramska, 1995;Jacobs and Juliano, 1995); (Celikel and Sakmann, 2007;Clem et al, 2008;Cohen and Castro-Alamancos, 2010;Galvez et al, 2007;Grion et al, 2016;Guic et al, 2008;Juczewski et al, 2016;Krupa et al, 2001;Miceli et al, 2017;Miyashita and Feldman, 2013;O'Connor et al, 2010;Rosselet et al, 2011;Safaai et al, 2013;Topchiy et al, 2009;Troncoso et al, 2007;Voigts et al, 2015;Waiblinger et al, 2015)), will likely lead the way.…”
Section: ) From Synaptic Plasticity To Synaptic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, if the experimental design requires targeted alteration of molecular/cellular function, upon, e.g., sensory deprivation (Celikel et al, 2004;Foeller, Celikel, & Feldman, 2005), induction of synaptic plasticity in identified pathways (Allen et al, 2003;Clem, Celikel, & Barth, 2008), systematic modulation of cellular excitability (Huang et al, 2016;Juczewski et al, 2016;Miceli et al, 2017), circuit alterations (Corsini et al, 2009;Freudenberg et al, 2013aFreudenberg et al, , 2013bFreudenberg et al, , 2016Seib et al, 2013), or behavioral training (Celikel & Sakmann, 2007;Seib et al, 2013;Voigts, Herman, & Celikel, 2015), it would be advisable to design the experiments to ensure availability of within-animal and within-slice (wherever applicable) controls to minimize the genomic variability across independent samples and the experimental groups.…”
Section: Of 21mentioning
confidence: 99%