2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatosensory evoked potentials and high-frequency oscillations in athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The left one, on the contrary, is responsible for perception of little details of the picture [16][17][18]. The data are agreed with complementary principle, when the left hemisphere outgoes the right one in perception of information, and the right one, getting information independently and through the left one, is a leading one as to the stimuli processing [19].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results Of Researchsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The left one, on the contrary, is responsible for perception of little details of the picture [16][17][18]. The data are agreed with complementary principle, when the left hemisphere outgoes the right one in perception of information, and the right one, getting information independently and through the left one, is a leading one as to the stimuli processing [19].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results Of Researchsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For example, performance in sports is improved by training, which develops relevant sensory–motor skills, and these improved skills are reflected in neuroplastic alterations in relevant cortical regions. Studies on athletes using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) following tactile stimulation suggest that specific training can modify the excitability of the somatosensory cortex and neuronal circuits of the brain related to specific cognitive processes[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, several EEG studies exploring the "neural efficiency" hypothesis in elite athletes have shown conflicting results (Fattapposta et al, 1996;Konttinen et al, 1999;Haufler et al, 2000;Janelle et al, 2000;Loze et al, 2001;Bulut et al, 2003;Hung et al, 2004;Iwadate et al, 2005;Ozmerdivenli et al, 2005;Endo et al, 2006;Di Russo et al, 2005Murakami et al, 2008;Nakamoto and Mori, 2008;Del Percio et al, 2008, 2009bNakata et al, 2010;. Some previous studies are in line with "neural efficiency" hypothesis, showing more selective cortical activation in elite athletes than in non-athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Compared with pre-elite shooters, elite shooters were characterized by an increase of frontal slow potentials during motor preparation for rifle shooting (Konttinen et al, 1999). Furthermore, the amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials and highfrequency oscillations were higher in football, racquetball and volleyball players than in non-athletes (Bulut et al, 2003;Murakami et al, 2008). Finally, expert golfers were characterized by stronger alpha ERD in successful than unsuccessful putt .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%