1993
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatosensory cortical plasticity in adult humans revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Abstract: Microelectrode recordings in adult mammals have clearly demonstrated that somatosensory cortical maps reorganize following peripheral nerve injuries and functional modifications; however, such reorganization has never been directly demonstrated in humans. Using magnetoencephalography, we have been able to demonstrate the somatotopic organization of the hand area in normal humans with high spatial precision. Somatosensory cortical plasticity was detected in two adults who were studied before and after surgical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been reported that d1-d3 distances expand when patterned stimulation is delivered to digits 1, 3, and 5 compared to when these digits are stimulated in a random order (Braun et al, 2000a) and that d1-d5 distances expand when the intervening digits 2, 3, and 4 are anesthetized (Buchner et al, 1995 or when fingers conjoined by syndactly are separated by surgery (Mogilner et al, 1993). In addition, the strength of the cortical representation when multiple digits are stimulated concurrently is less than the sum of their individual representations (Liu et al, 2000), which suggests that digit representations are tuned by reciprocal interactions in agreement with findings reported by Mirabella et al (2001) for rat barrel neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been reported that d1-d3 distances expand when patterned stimulation is delivered to digits 1, 3, and 5 compared to when these digits are stimulated in a random order (Braun et al, 2000a) and that d1-d5 distances expand when the intervening digits 2, 3, and 4 are anesthetized (Buchner et al, 1995 or when fingers conjoined by syndactly are separated by surgery (Mogilner et al, 1993). In addition, the strength of the cortical representation when multiple digits are stimulated concurrently is less than the sum of their individual representations (Liu et al, 2000), which suggests that digit representations are tuned by reciprocal interactions in agreement with findings reported by Mirabella et al (2001) for rat barrel neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes are surprisingly rapid. Both human and primate studies have reported that changes in cortical activity take place within the first few weeks following injury (Merzenich et al, 1983;Mogilner et al, 1993) and that chronic changes begin within the first two months (Churchill, Muja, Myers, Besheer, & Garraghty, 1998). These changes take place in several forms including alteration of normal inhibition/excitation processes, atrophy of normal structures and formation of new connections .…”
Section: Changes Within the Central Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, surgically joining two digits in monkeys resulted in a fused cortical receptive field for those two digits, 11,12 while surgical separation of digits in syndactylous Clinical Neuroscience 1111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50111 1 2 3 4 5 humans led to a separation of the cortical representational zones of the digits. 13 Similarly, Sterr et al 14,15 found that the cortical representation of the digits became topographically disordered in blind individuals who read Braille with three fingers simultaneously for many hours on a daily basis. Thus, extensive simultaneous stimulation of the digits and other types of prolonged, unusual types of sensory input can produce a use-dependent reorganization of digital receptive fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%