2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic point mutation of the wild-type allele detected in tumors of patients with VHL germline deletion

Abstract: (VHL) disease are aected by a VHL germline mutation involving one copy of the VHL gene. Loss of heterozygosity of the second VHL allele can be consistently demonstrated in tumor tissue from these patients, suggesting that allelic deletion is a very early or even initiating event for tumorigenesis. Approximately 20% of VHL disease patients, however, exhibit germline deletion of one entire copy or at least a substantial part of the VHL gene. To investigate the nature of thè second genetic hit' in this patient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar discrepancy in the frequency of LOH between patients with a germline gene deletion and a germline intragenic mutation has been observed in tumors of patients with the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome and in patients with retinoblastoma. In VHL patients with a germline deletion of VHL, no LOH was observed in eight tumors analyzed (0/8 tumors, 95% CI, 0-31%) (Vortmeyer et al, 2002;Wait et al, 2004), while this is a frequent event in tumors without a germline deletion (81/132 tumors ¼ 61%, 95% CI, 52-70%) (Crossey et al, 1994;Zeiger et al, 1995;Prowse et al, 1997;Bender et al, 2000;Glasker et al, 2001;Vortmeyer et al, 2002). Also, no LOH was observed for RB1 in 12 retinoblastoma patients with a germline deletion of RB1 (0/12 tumors, 95% CI, 0-22%), whereas 69% of the tumors from individuals without a germline deletion had LOH (101/146 tumors, 95% CI, 61-77%) (Hagstrom and Dryja, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A similar discrepancy in the frequency of LOH between patients with a germline gene deletion and a germline intragenic mutation has been observed in tumors of patients with the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome and in patients with retinoblastoma. In VHL patients with a germline deletion of VHL, no LOH was observed in eight tumors analyzed (0/8 tumors, 95% CI, 0-31%) (Vortmeyer et al, 2002;Wait et al, 2004), while this is a frequent event in tumors without a germline deletion (81/132 tumors ¼ 61%, 95% CI, 52-70%) (Crossey et al, 1994;Zeiger et al, 1995;Prowse et al, 1997;Bender et al, 2000;Glasker et al, 2001;Vortmeyer et al, 2002). Also, no LOH was observed for RB1 in 12 retinoblastoma patients with a germline deletion of RB1 (0/12 tumors, 95% CI, 0-22%), whereas 69% of the tumors from individuals without a germline deletion had LOH (101/146 tumors, 95% CI, 61-77%) (Hagstrom and Dryja, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For the tumor to develop, a second hit must occur [Knudson, 1971] that inactivates the wild-type VHL allele. In the majority of tumors, this second hit consists of a large VHL deletion or a VHL point mutation [Vortmeyer et al, 2002;Wait et al, 2004;Wong et al, 2007].…”
Section: Official Journal Wwwhgvsorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, approximately 20% of VHL patients exhibit germline deletion of an entire copy or of at least a substantial part of the VHL gene [Friedrich, 2001]. According to the genotype, one might expect that patients carrying a germline gross deletion would develop a ccRCC, but interestingly a lower prevalence of ccRCC has been described in patients with complete germline deletions of VHL, suggesting that this genotype may be associated with a mild clinical presentation (low risk of ccRCC) [Cybulski et al, 2002;Maranchie et al, 2004;Vortmeyer et al, 2002;Wait et al, 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%