2014
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic mosaicism in a Cornelia de Lange syndrome patient with NIPBL mutation identified by different next generation sequencing approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reports support a postzygotic event. Indeed, somatic mosaicism has already been identified on leukocytes for four different NIPBL mutations, namely a large intragenic deletion, a frame shift, a nonsense and a missense mutation, by array‐comparative genomic hybridisation, pyrosequencing and exome sequencing, respectively . Almost 50% of patients negative for NIPBL mutation in leucocytes are predicted to have a somatic mosaicism Embryological data are in agreement with these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Other reports support a postzygotic event. Indeed, somatic mosaicism has already been identified on leukocytes for four different NIPBL mutations, namely a large intragenic deletion, a frame shift, a nonsense and a missense mutation, by array‐comparative genomic hybridisation, pyrosequencing and exome sequencing, respectively . Almost 50% of patients negative for NIPBL mutation in leucocytes are predicted to have a somatic mosaicism Embryological data are in agreement with these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Mutation analyses by Ion AmpliSeq‐Ion PGM were performed as described previously [Ansari et al., ; Baquero‐Montoya et al., ; Braunholz et al., ]. Briefly, 10–20 ng of genomic DNA were amplified using custom‐designed gene panels (Ion AmpliSeq ™ ; Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) to cover the coding exons of the known CdLS genes, including approximately 90% of the coding sequence of SMC3 (NC_000010) and its splice junctions in particular.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all cases are sporadic with de novo heterozygous loss‐of‐function mutations in NIPBL (MIM #608667) being the most common genetic finding in typical CdLS [Gillis et al., ; Krantz et al., ; Tonkin et al., ; Selicorni et al., ; Pie et al., ; Wierzba et al., ]. A proportion of the “ NIPBL ‐negative” cases with typical CdLS have recently been shown to have mosaic NIPBL mutations, often undetected in the blood by Sanger‐based screening [Huisman et al., ; Ansari et al., ; Baquero‐Montoya et al., ; Braunholz et al., ]. Mutations in four other genes have been reported to account for a smaller proportion of mostly atypical cases; SMC1A (MIM #300040) on chromosome Xp11 (∼4%–6%), SMC3 (MIM #606062) on chromosome 10q25 (<1%), RAD21 (MIM #606462) on chromosome 8q24 (<1%), and HDAC8 (MIM #300269) on chromosome Xq13 (4%) [Musio et al., ; Deardorff et al., , , ; Kaiser et al., ; Minor et al., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent findings indicate a high percentage of CdLS‐causing mosaic mutations in NIPBL that were previously excluded by conventional Sanger sequencing approaches using DNA isolated from blood samples [Castronovo et al., ; Huisman et al., ; Baquero‐Montoya et al., ]. Huisman et al.…”
Section: Application and Analysis Of Different Sequencing Methods In mentioning
confidence: 99%