2015
DOI: 10.1080/09672559.2015.1016995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic Intentionality Bifurcated: A Sellarsian Response to Sachs’s Merleau-Pontyan Account of Intentionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carl B. Sachs Christias (2015) criticizes my attempt to use Merleau-Ponty to question assumptions shared by Sellars and McDowell on how perceptual experience bears on propositionally structured thought and discourse (Sachs, 2014a). Here I will first briefly recapitulate my view, then consider the two main areas of contention: whether Sellars can accept that perceptual experience is non-discursive and whether I can accept the normative significance of perception.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Carl B. Sachs Christias (2015) criticizes my attempt to use Merleau-Ponty to question assumptions shared by Sellars and McDowell on how perceptual experience bears on propositionally structured thought and discourse (Sachs, 2014a). Here I will first briefly recapitulate my view, then consider the two main areas of contention: whether Sellars can accept that perceptual experience is non-discursive and whether I can accept the normative significance of perception.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 93%