2003
DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0117:scmatg]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic Cell Mutations at the Glycophorin A Locus in Erythrocytes of Radiation Workers from the Sellafield Nuclear Facility

Abstract: The glycophorin A (GPA) somatic mutation assay for N0 and NN mutant erythrocytes was performed on 245 current and 48 retired workers who had been occupationally exposed to radiation at the British Nuclear Fuels plc facility at Sellafield. A positive association with increasing age was found for current workers for both N0 and NN frequencies of 0.14 +/- 0.05 x 10(-6) (P = 0.012) and 0.25 +/- 0.07 x 10(-6) (P = 0.0003) per year, respectively. No association with age was found for the retired workers. In a compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The doubling dose for GPA mutations has been estimated to be approximately 1.2 Sv, with a threshold dose of approximately 0.24 Sv (Kyoizumi et al., 1996). A sizeable threshold dose for these GPA-related mutations is most likely responsible for largely negative findings of a number of investigators who used the GPA assay to monitor mutations within erythrocytes of individuals having a prior history of very low radiation exposures (Tawn et al., 2003). (A54) The timing and expression of radiation-induced mutations within HPCs have been investigated (Kadhim et al., 1992, 1994; Wang et al., 1996; Watson et al., 1996, 2001; Kadhim and Wright, 1998; MacDonald et al., 2001; McIlrath et al., 2003).…”
Section: Annex a Haematopoietic Tissues: Role Played By Stem Cells Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The doubling dose for GPA mutations has been estimated to be approximately 1.2 Sv, with a threshold dose of approximately 0.24 Sv (Kyoizumi et al., 1996). A sizeable threshold dose for these GPA-related mutations is most likely responsible for largely negative findings of a number of investigators who used the GPA assay to monitor mutations within erythrocytes of individuals having a prior history of very low radiation exposures (Tawn et al., 2003). (A54) The timing and expression of radiation-induced mutations within HPCs have been investigated (Kadhim et al., 1992, 1994; Wang et al., 1996; Watson et al., 1996, 2001; Kadhim and Wright, 1998; MacDonald et al., 2001; McIlrath et al., 2003).…”
Section: Annex a Haematopoietic Tissues: Role Played By Stem Cells Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doubling dose for GPA mutations has been estimated to be approximately 1.2 Sv, with a threshold dose of approximately 0.24 Sv (Kyoizumi et al., 1996). A sizeable threshold dose for these GPA-related mutations is most likely responsible for largely negative findings of a number of investigators who used the GPA assay to monitor mutations within erythrocytes of individuals having a prior history of very low radiation exposures (Tawn et al., 2003).…”
Section: Annex a Haematopoietic Tissues: Role Played By Stem Cells Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches have been explored as well including the use of somatic null mutations at the glycophorin A locus on the surface of blood erythrocytes, micronucleus assay, and measurement of premature chromosome condensation, PCC and all have been found to be reliable indicators of exposure over a broad dose range (0.25 to 8 Gy) in the laboratory with high doses of ionizing radiation but with poor dosimetric discrimination at lower doses (Bigbee et al, 1997;Gray and Pinkel., 1994;Jones et al, 2001;Brown et al, 1997;Tawn et al, 2003;Bedford and Dewey, 2002;Durante 1996;Kanda 1999). Variations of the PCC assay (Prasanna, 2000) may provide dose estimates in less than 24 hours for relatively high doses of ionizing radiation, but still require validation.…”
Section: Biological and Clinical Signatures Of Radiation Dose Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%