2010
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic cell count assessment at the quarter or cow milking level

Abstract: The aim was to investigate whether on-line somatic cell count (SCC) assessment, when combined with electrical conductivity (EC), should be implemented at the udder quarter or at the cow level. Data were collected from 3 farms with automatic milking systems, resulting in 3,191 quarter milkings used in the analyses. Visual observations of foremilk and quarter milk samples for laboratory SCC analysis were used to define 2 gold standards. One was based on visual observation only and the other was based on a combin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cows were housed in free-stalls, fed a total mixed ration, and milked three times daily. Twelve healthy cows considered free of mastitis (somatic cell count less than 500 000 cells/ml) as measured by Fossomatic 5000 (Foss Electric, Hilerød, Denmark) on day 14 and 21 after calving and 12 cows with subclinical mastitis (somatic cell counts > 500 000 cells/ml) (Liu et al, 2010;Mollenhorst et al, 2010) were selected for proteomic analysis. Cows with any other diseases or disorders according to veterinarian records, such as retained placenta and metritis, were excluded from analysis in agreement with this record.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cows were housed in free-stalls, fed a total mixed ration, and milked three times daily. Twelve healthy cows considered free of mastitis (somatic cell count less than 500 000 cells/ml) as measured by Fossomatic 5000 (Foss Electric, Hilerød, Denmark) on day 14 and 21 after calving and 12 cows with subclinical mastitis (somatic cell counts > 500 000 cells/ml) (Liu et al, 2010;Mollenhorst et al, 2010) were selected for proteomic analysis. Cows with any other diseases or disorders according to veterinarian records, such as retained placenta and metritis, were excluded from analysis in agreement with this record.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a low number in comparison with the 573 CM cases used by Milne et al (2003) and the 3833 CM cases used by Steeneveld et al (2009), but it is a high number of CM cases in the field of CM detection using sensor data. Studies in the field of automated CM detection often use a lot less CM cases for analyses (e.g., 19 CM cases used by Mollenhorst et al, 2010, and 36 CM cases used by Song et al, 2010). It is likely that the inclusion of more CM cases with sensor information and bacteriological results will improve the robustness of decision trees predicting the Gram-status or the CM causal pathogens itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such comparisons are hampered by the fact that designs and analyses of diagnostic studies vary . Moreover, many of these studies used multiple tests in combination or employed algorithms to increase test performance (e.g., Chagunda et al, 2006;Mollenhorst et al, 2010), complicating a direct comparison with the test performance of PA measurement. Comparison to EC and SCC within the current study would have allowed for comparing the test performance of PA measurement with EC and SCC, but this could not be performed because the clinical milk samples had been frozen, which affects SCC test results (Barkema et al, 1997) and likely also EC.…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%