2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somaclonal variation in olive ( Olea europaea L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis: Influence of genotype and culture age on phenotypic stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have indicated that the genotype/species plays an important role in the frequency of genetic alterations during somatic embryogenesis (Burg et al 2007). The genotype, conditions and culture of the in vitro culture are considered to be parameters that influence genetic stability; however, some studies do not show a significant effect from these factors (Burg et al 2007, Carloni et al 2014, Mamedes-Rodrigues et al 2018. In the present study, although the explants showed different responses to the time of propagation, in general, we observed a reduction in genetic fidelity with increased cycles of induction at 2.26 μM 2,4-D (≈3 %).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have indicated that the genotype/species plays an important role in the frequency of genetic alterations during somatic embryogenesis (Burg et al 2007). The genotype, conditions and culture of the in vitro culture are considered to be parameters that influence genetic stability; however, some studies do not show a significant effect from these factors (Burg et al 2007, Carloni et al 2014, Mamedes-Rodrigues et al 2018. In the present study, although the explants showed different responses to the time of propagation, in general, we observed a reduction in genetic fidelity with increased cycles of induction at 2.26 μM 2,4-D (≈3 %).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…8 and 9), genetic distances among explants varied from 0.02 to 0.18 with 2.26 μM 2,4-D while from 0.05 to 0.13 at 4.52 μM 2,4-D. The differential response of explants might be attributable to differences in sensitivity to the stresses caused by in vitro culture (Bradaï et al 2016). Other studies have indicated that the genotype/species plays an important role in the frequency of genetic alterations during somatic embryogenesis (Burg et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the past three decades, additional researchers have studied the induction, proliferation, maturation, and germination of SEs (Cornu and Jay-Allemand, 1989;Tulecke et al, 1988;Vahdati et al, 2006). Despite all the benefits that somatic embryos have for biotechnological advancements, plantlets regenerated from somatic embryos could exhibit somaclonal variation (Brada€ ı et al, 2016). Heritable adverse changes due to somaclonal variation can be a problematic in tree-breeding programs, which typically encounter long juvenile phases before phenotypic selection of mature elite genotypes, a delay period requiring substantial investment of time and money (Fourr e et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, homogeneity and trueness-to-type of regenerated plantlets should be checked. Several methods are available for this analysis, including chromosome determination, flow cytometry, molecular markers, and biochemical and phenotypic analyses (Brada€ ı et al, 2016;Harding, 2004;Sadat-Hosseini et al, 2011). Molecular analyses and flow cytometry have been used in many species to evaluate the trueness-to-type of plantlets regenerated via somatic embryogenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%