2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.95.012412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the two-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation for strongly correlated neurons

Abstract: Pairs of neurons in brain networks often share much of the input they receive from other neurons. Due to essential non-linearities of the neuronal dynamics, the consequences for the correlation of the output spike trains are generally not well understood. Here we analyze the case of two leaky integrate-and-fire neurons using a novel non-perturbative approach. Our treatment covers both weakly and strongly correlated dynamics, generalizing previous results based on linear response theory.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, the theory may become the starting point of analytical approaches beyond the existing ones that are limited to IF models with weak or shortcorrelated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise. Second, with more efficient algorithms (efficient tools for the solution of multidimensional FPEs [102,103] might be useful here) also higher-dimensional situations, e.g., an adapting neuron with narrow-band noise input (corresponding to a system of four stochastic differential equations) might be tractable; possible candidates are eigenfunction expansions [104,105] and the matrix-continued-fraction method [13]. Third, similar to the one-dimensional white-noise case [30,31], the calculation of the firing-rate modulation in response to a time-dependent stimulus (other than noise) will follow a very similar mathematical framework as presented here for the calculation of the power spectrum.…”
Section: Summary and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the theory may become the starting point of analytical approaches beyond the existing ones that are limited to IF models with weak or shortcorrelated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise. Second, with more efficient algorithms (efficient tools for the solution of multidimensional FPEs [102,103] might be useful here) also higher-dimensional situations, e.g., an adapting neuron with narrow-band noise input (corresponding to a system of four stochastic differential equations) might be tractable; possible candidates are eigenfunction expansions [104,105] and the matrix-continued-fraction method [13]. Third, similar to the one-dimensional white-noise case [30,31], the calculation of the firing-rate modulation in response to a time-dependent stimulus (other than noise) will follow a very similar mathematical framework as presented here for the calculation of the power spectrum.…”
Section: Summary and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 For the simpler but still formidable problem of how neuron pairs respond to cross-correlated Gaussian white noise sources, see, for instance, Doiron et al ( 2004 ); de la Rocha et al ( 2007 ); Shea-Brown et al ( 2008 ); Ostojic et al ( 2009 ); Vilela and Lindner ( 2009b ); Deniz and Rotter ( 2017 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When input correlations are weak, covariance transfer for integrate-and-fire neurons is approximately linear so linear response approaches are justified [8,53,54], but transfer can become nonlinear (but still O(1)) when correlations are stronger [54,79,80]. Our results show that, even when the transfer of input covariance to spike train covariance is nonlinear, the mean-field relationship between X, X and S, S is still linear to highest order in N and is the same relationship one would obtain if transfer were linear.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%