2015
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the Puzzle of Recruitment and Retention—Strategies for Building a Robust Clinical and Translational Research Workforce

Abstract: This paper is the first in a five-part series on the clinical and translational science educational pipeline and presents strategies to support recruitment and retention to create diverse pathways into clinical and translational research (CTR). The strategies address multiple levels or contexts of persistence decisions and include: 1) creating a seamless pipeline by forming strategic partnerships to achieve continuity of support for scholars and collective impact; 2) providing meaningful research opportunities… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without appropriate preparation for career success, we risk the loss of talented scientists in clinical and translational research. 3 To ensure adequate preparation and strengthen the pipeline, it is important to carefully consider graduate education in the sciences, a logical point of intervention for the biomedical workforce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without appropriate preparation for career success, we risk the loss of talented scientists in clinical and translational research. 3 To ensure adequate preparation and strengthen the pipeline, it is important to carefully consider graduate education in the sciences, a logical point of intervention for the biomedical workforce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The overall goal of this series is to describe how institutions may develop an effective educational pipeline along the entire academic and career development continuum. Here, we focus on the crucial step of graduate research education as we pursue the objective of crafting training programs that will best prepare young scientists for careers in clinical and translational research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e fi rst article in this series underscored the importance of an intentional, long-term commitment to expanding pathways to clinical and translational research careers-work that should target multiple levels. 2 It argued that to be eff ective, such eff orts must extend the pipeline to include early academic and career development to ensure there is continuity of engagement and support across the various contexts that shape persistence decisions. In our followup to that article, we documented the importance of primary and secondary schools in contributing to the early formation of an identity as a scientist and to developing a vision of science as a career.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more “robust translational research workforce” is central to this initiative, and has encouraged renewed attention to education, training, and career development opportunities at various levels of preparation . The present paper is the second in a five‐part series that explores strategies for supporting recruitment and retention across an expanded pipeline intended to create diverse pathways into clinical and translational research . Here, we focus on a crucial step early in the educational process: namely, the recruitment, retention, and advancement of promising middle and high school students to relevant career tracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearing et al . () talk of the importance of meaningful, authentic and relevant research and research experiences in forming a scientist identity and sustaining motivation to pursue and persist in research careers. We all highly value the meaningful outcomes of our sustained research programmes which were motivated by a passion for wanting to make a difference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%