Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem with a novel parallel branch and bound algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group considers the exact algorithm as a way to generate a schedule [22][23][24]. Research by [22] proposed constraint programming after analyzing the MILP (Mixed Integer Linear Programming) model of FJS, [23] adopted a branch and bound approach, and [24] The position of this paper is in the second group, which considers the implementation of a heuristic algorithm on FJS, in this case, LPT. Our research aims to improve the research done by [2] and [3] by modifying the LPT algorithm to minimize makespan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group considers the exact algorithm as a way to generate a schedule [22][23][24]. Research by [22] proposed constraint programming after analyzing the MILP (Mixed Integer Linear Programming) model of FJS, [23] adopted a branch and bound approach, and [24] The position of this paper is in the second group, which considers the implementation of a heuristic algorithm on FJS, in this case, LPT. Our research aims to improve the research done by [2] and [3] by modifying the LPT algorithm to minimize makespan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These solutions come from artificial intelligence techniques, which have been active in planning and scheduling for four decades [15]. Therefore, many heuristics and metaheuristics such as genetic algorithms, honey bee optimization, artificial bee colony, ant colony optimization, particle swarm optimization, simulated annealing, and hybrid approaches have been proposed to solve the FJSSP [16]. Chaudhry and Khan [17] performed a review of techniques addressing the FJSSP, highlighting ant colony optimization (ACO), artificial bee colony (ABC), artificial immune system (AIS), evolutionary algorithms, greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP), Integer/Linear programming, neighborhood search (NS), particle swarm optimization (PSO), simulated annealing (SA), tabu search (TS), mathematical programming, deterministic heuristics, hybrid techniques, and miscellaneous techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al 12 combined several heuristic strategies and a TS algorithm, constructed a discrete artificial bee colony (DABC) algorithm, and addressed a scheduling problem that simultaneously minimizes makespan, total work load, and maximal workload. Soto et al 13 studied the multi-objective FJSP with the aim of minimizing the total workload, maximal workload and makespan, and proposed a parallel branch and bound algorithm (B&B). With the consideration of the deterioration effect and environmental pollution problem, Wu et al 14 formulated a multi-objective optimization model based on the energy consumption and step-deterioration effect model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%