r 1987
DOI: 10.20955/r.69.5-23.ktb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the 1980s' Velocity Puzzle: A Progress Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The breakdown in these relationships also has been discussed as a decline in the growth rate of Ml velocity. See Stone and Thornton (1987), for example, for a survey of explanations that have been offered for this abrupt shift in what had been quite stable relationships. Tatom (1988) and others, in contrast, have disputed whether historical relationships between Ml and nominal variables were fundamentally different in the 1980s.…”
Section: Ii'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breakdown in these relationships also has been discussed as a decline in the growth rate of Ml velocity. See Stone and Thornton (1987), for example, for a survey of explanations that have been offered for this abrupt shift in what had been quite stable relationships. Tatom (1988) and others, in contrast, have disputed whether historical relationships between Ml and nominal variables were fundamentally different in the 1980s.…”
Section: Ii'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But instability of the money velocity function since the late 1970's in the U.S. has called for a reexamination of the traditional views. See, e.g., Stone and Thornton (1987). One line of research focuses on the correct measurement of money snd challenges the traditional practice of ignoring the aggregation problem in monetary economics research and policy design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Fisher, and after him Keynes, suggested to distinguish between transactions arising from the sale or purchase of finished goods and services (which can be measured by GDP) and financial transactions that are not related to national income. 15 Theoretical and empirical work using a similar distinction includes Selden (1956), Spindt (1985), Cramer (1986), Stone and Thornton (1987), Niggle (1988) and Allen (1989). The UK's Central Statistical Office (1986) argued that the total value of transactions should be used in the quantity equation, while GDP was merely a subset of transactions involving final output.…”
Section: To Refer To All Transactions -Purchases Of Final Goods and Smentioning
confidence: 99%