2022
DOI: 10.1080/27684830.2022.2109301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving singularly perturbed delay differential equations via fitted mesh and exact difference method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the appearance of the boundary layer in the solution of a singularly perturbed differential equation, classical numerical methods on equidistant grids are inadequate and fail to provide a reliable approximation, when the perturbation parameter tends to zero, unless otherwise, if one uses an unacceptably large number of grid points. Several articles have been written on the solution method for singularly perturbed delay differential equations, to cite a few [9][10][11][12][13]. Among the recently conducted studies on SPTDDE of the convection-diffusion type, having a right end boundary layer, in [14], the authors used an implicit-trapezoidal scheme on uniform mesh for temporal discretization, and for spatial discretization, a hybrid scheme, which is a combination of the midpoint upwind scheme and the central difference scheme on Shishkin type meshes, is applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the appearance of the boundary layer in the solution of a singularly perturbed differential equation, classical numerical methods on equidistant grids are inadequate and fail to provide a reliable approximation, when the perturbation parameter tends to zero, unless otherwise, if one uses an unacceptably large number of grid points. Several articles have been written on the solution method for singularly perturbed delay differential equations, to cite a few [9][10][11][12][13]. Among the recently conducted studies on SPTDDE of the convection-diffusion type, having a right end boundary layer, in [14], the authors used an implicit-trapezoidal scheme on uniform mesh for temporal discretization, and for spatial discretization, a hybrid scheme, which is a combination of the midpoint upwind scheme and the central difference scheme on Shishkin type meshes, is applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors accomplished derivation of the method by including a fitted factor in the constructed numerical scheme which is based on a special type of grids, and the fitted factor is evaluated applying the theory of singular perturbation. Woldaregay [8] solved singularly perturbed differential equations with delays by developing three different schemes. The author used nonstandard mid-point upwind finite difference method on uniform grids, a standard mid-point upwind finite difference method on Shiskin's meshes and a nonstandard mid-point upwind finite difference method on Shiskin's meshes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te nonstandard FDM on Shishkin mesh has better accuracy and order of convergence than the equivalent standard FDM on Shishkin mesh [20]. In addition, the uniform convergence analysis of the nonstandard FDMs were restricted to uniform mesh [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], He and Wang developed a new form of the nonstandard FDM for solving a convection dominated difusion equation. In the study of [20], Woldaregay developed numerical schemes using the nonstandard FDM on uniform mesh and Shishkin mesh for solving singularly perturbed boundary value problem. Motivated by the results in [20,21], in this paper we proposed a uniformly convergent numerical scheme for solving the problem in (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation