2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipl.2014.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving SCS for bounded length strings in fewer than steps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It works faster than existing classical algorithms. At the same time, there are faster classical algorithms in the case of restricted length of strings [11,12]. It is interesting to explore quantum algorithms for such a restriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It works faster than existing classical algorithms. At the same time, there are faster classical algorithms in the case of restricted length of strings [11,12]. It is interesting to explore quantum algorithms for such a restriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a length of strings s i is at most 3, then the there is an algorithm [11] with running time O * (1.443 n ). For a constant c, if a length of strings s i is at most c, then there is a randomized algorithm [12] with running time O * (2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HOG is reminiscent of the "Hierarchical Graph" of [6], where the arcs also encodes inclusion between substrings of the input words. However, in the Hierarchical Graph, each arc extends or shortens the string by a single symbol, making it larger than the HOG.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such algorithms can only be used in practice to solve instances of very moderate size. Stronger upper bounds are known for a special case when input strings have bounded length [12,13]. There are heuristic methods for solving Traveling Salesman, and hence also Shortest Superstring, they are efficient in practice, however have no efficient provable guarantee on the running time (see, e.g., [1]).…”
Section: Shortest Superstringmentioning
confidence: 99%