2006
DOI: 10.1007/11914952_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Scheduling Problems in Grid Resource Management Using an Evolutionary Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berman et al proposed a complex adaptive scheduling algorithm and dynamic resource selection method that can be performed automatically as well as co-allocation of data and computing (Berman et al, 2005). In addition, Stucky et al studied the evolution of GA-based grid resource scheduling problems (Stucky et al, 2006).…”
Section: K 435mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berman et al proposed a complex adaptive scheduling algorithm and dynamic resource selection method that can be performed automatically as well as co-allocation of data and computing (Berman et al, 2005). In addition, Stucky et al studied the evolution of GA-based grid resource scheduling problems (Stucky et al, 2006).…”
Section: K 435mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when several virtual machines are dispatched to same physical machine, system performance of the latter would be greatly slowed or even cause meltdown. Hence algorithms on virtualization level resource load allocation becomes an active research theme [19] [20].…”
Section: Cloud Virtuliza Tl On and Load Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both CCS and GORBA re‐compute the schedule from scratch when a dynamic change such as job arrival or machine failure appears. Although it helps to keep the schedule up to date, for large number of jobs this approach may be quite time consuming as was discussed in the case of GORBA (Stucky et al 2006). Several papers (Abraham, Buyya, and Nath 2000; Subrata, Zomaya, and Landfeldt 2007) propose local search‐based methods to solve Grid scheduling problems without total re‐computation; however, no experimental evaluation was presented in Abraham et al (2000), and (Subrata et al 2007) does include resource changes but no dynamic job arrivals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably these authors are not aware of any earlier work in the context of Grid scheduling which would concentrate on incremental application of local search or schedule‐based methods and study its impact on running time of scheduling algorithms. Because re‐computation from scratch was discussed to be time consuming (Stucky et al 2006), our goal is to concentrate on these issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%