2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving protein nanocrystals by cryo-EM diffraction: Multiple scattering artifacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to dynamical scattering theory (10), multiple scattering events produce inaccuracies in the recorded reflections, potentially preventing the solution of structures. Simulations suggest that with crystals thicker than 50-100 nm (11,12) dynamical scattering can be severe, resulting in nearly random intensities, where the relationship between the intensity and structure factor no longer holds true (10). However, these simulations assume diffraction is recorded from a perfect and stationary crystal -real macromolecular crystals are not perfect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to dynamical scattering theory (10), multiple scattering events produce inaccuracies in the recorded reflections, potentially preventing the solution of structures. Simulations suggest that with crystals thicker than 50-100 nm (11,12) dynamical scattering can be severe, resulting in nearly random intensities, where the relationship between the intensity and structure factor no longer holds true (10). However, these simulations assume diffraction is recorded from a perfect and stationary crystal -real macromolecular crystals are not perfect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because MicroED is capable of producing atomic resolution data, direct methods approaches used in X-ray crystallography should be applicable to MicroED. The influence of dynamical scattering on the measured intensities was thought to limit accurate determination of structure factors (23)(24)(25)(26). The hypothesis of whether these effects limit ab initio determination of macromolecular structures from protein nanocrystals has been difficult to test because a crystal formed from macromolecules has yet to diffract to better than 1.2 Å by electron-based techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical scattering can compromise structure solution of crystals of macromolecules, since current phasing methods and refinement procedures do not account for its effects. Thin crystals minimize the effects of dynamic scattering, and on the basis of multi-slice simulations it has been suggested that the maximal thickness of a protein crystal that still allows structure solution is about 100 nm for 200 keV electrons (Subramanian et al, 2015), but these calculations ignore inelastic scattering, which is three times more prevalent than elastic diffraction for organic samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%