2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11104425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Non-Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Time Couplings

Abstract: In this paper, a non-permutation variant of the Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Time Couplings and makespan minimization is considered. Time couplings are defined as machine minimum and maximum idle time allowed. The problem is inspired by the concreting process encountered in industry. The mathematical model of the problem and solution graph representation are presented. Several problem properties are formulated, including the time complexity of the goal function computation and block elimination property. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, both the minimal and maximal idle time constraints can be enforced at the same time. This can be used to model some time-sensitive processes in construction, for example, the concreting process [23].…”
Section: Problem Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, both the minimal and maximal idle time constraints can be enforced at the same time. This can be used to model some time-sensitive processes in construction, for example, the concreting process [23].…”
Section: Problem Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible method of constructing schedule C from solution π is described by Algorithm 1. The method is nearly identical to the one shown for the non-permutation variant of the problem in [23]. In line 1, the completion time for processing job π(1) on machine 1 is set, since that job has no constraints.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other examples are (3,12,4,2), (7,9,8) and (7,11). This concept is similar to the notion of critical block commonly used in the context of shop scheduling problems [16,50]. Throughout, for a C-path P, T(P) will denote its tardiness, i.e., the sum of the tardiness values of all the jobs contained in it.…”
Section: Local Search Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%